ok--well the man i referred toobviously took legal advice--it was a serious allegation after all.
now--heres the twist. the court would probably find in favour of the accuser--and he would get a lengthy prison sentence.
his lawyer advised him to plead guilty--and save a lot of time and stress all round--and receive a reduced sentence in return.
this he did. he was released from prison within 3 years.
i talked to him after his release--he went back to his old job. none of us believed he actually did it--the accuser was being malicious and vindictive.
which begs the questions:
was he innocent ?
was he guilty ?
did he plead guilty--knowing he was--to get a shorter sentence
or did he plead guilty--knowing he was innocent--but also knowing the balance of probability would find in favour of the woman--and he decided to play the odds?
and finally--what would you have done in his position ?
the above really happened--i worked in the place 3 years--and his name was Mike.